Image
CASI project citizen panel meetings
Published on 07 May 2020
United Kingdom
This is the good practice's implementation level. It can be national, regional or local.
About this good practice
The CASI project was funded by the 7th Framework Programme and lasted for 42 months (January 2014 - June 2017). Its main aim was to investigate the scope of sustainable innovation as a societal phenomenon and develop an assessment framework of sustainable innovation practices, whose application can be integrated into public policy developments.
Within the project, CUE Ltd organised two citizen panel meetings to promote inclusiveness in the debate on sustainable innovation. During the first one, citizens worked out their visions for the sustainable future state of the environment by incorporating their concerns and hopes. Topics discussed included participation in the development of innovation, inclusiveness, ethics, gender and open access.
These visions (together with the visions from other citizens’ panels organised by other partners) were translated into 27 research priorities on sustainable innovation, by environmental, innovation research and policy research experts.
In the second meeting, the same citizens validated the research priorities identified by the experts.
A transnational Top-10 list of research priorities for a more sustainable future was also produced and presented to the European Commission to be taken into consideration for future research programmes decisions.
Within the project, CUE Ltd organised two citizen panel meetings to promote inclusiveness in the debate on sustainable innovation. During the first one, citizens worked out their visions for the sustainable future state of the environment by incorporating their concerns and hopes. Topics discussed included participation in the development of innovation, inclusiveness, ethics, gender and open access.
These visions (together with the visions from other citizens’ panels organised by other partners) were translated into 27 research priorities on sustainable innovation, by environmental, innovation research and policy research experts.
In the second meeting, the same citizens validated the research priorities identified by the experts.
A transnational Top-10 list of research priorities for a more sustainable future was also produced and presented to the European Commission to be taken into consideration for future research programmes decisions.
Resources needed
The cost was about £2400 (the first meeting lasted one day and involved 19 citizens; the second one lasted half day and 11 citizens attended). The staff cost was about £11000. This includes 3 people who organised and run the meetings and prepared the reports after the events, plus a facilitator.
Evidence of success
The first Meetings produced 50 visions for a more sustainable future, 4 of these produced in UK. The experts translated these 50 visions into research priorities and chose 27 for further elaboration.
In the second Meetings, the citizens validated the research priorities and produced a Top-10 list. The national Top-10s were later merged with the Top-10s from other panels organised by other partners to create a transnational Top-10 list of research priorities for a more sustainable future.
In the second Meetings, the citizens validated the research priorities and produced a Top-10 list. The national Top-10s were later merged with the Top-10s from other panels organised by other partners to create a transnational Top-10 list of research priorities for a more sustainable future.
Potential for learning or transfer
This practice is an example of how citizens or other stakeholders can be included and involved in the process of important public policy decisions. Therefore, the practice could be transferred to any kind of project or initiative where the opinion of stakeholders is needed and/or their engagement is required to achieve better results (like in sustainable urban mobility planning).
The methodology was first developed and used in the FP7 Blue Sky research project, CIVISTI. After being used in the CASI project, it was transferred to the Citizen Panels organised within the Interreg Europe Pe4Trans project.
The methodology was first developed and used in the FP7 Blue Sky research project, CIVISTI. After being used in the CASI project, it was transferred to the Citizen Panels organised within the Interreg Europe Pe4Trans project.
Further information
Website
Good practice owner
You can contact the good practice owner below for more detailed information.
Organisation
Coventry University Enterprises Ltd
United Kingdom
West Midlands
Contact
Projects Support Officer